Designing the PhD Hub website for NYU Tandon

Role

  • UX Designer

  • Web Developer

    (ad-hoc basis)

Timeline

  • Aug 2022 - Aug 2024

Team

  • 2 UX Designers

  • 2 Program Directors

  • NYU Engineering Team

Tools

  • Figma

  • HTML, CSS, JavaScript

  • Google Analytics

Quick Overview

The Problem -

A million tabs, zero clarity -

NYU students struggled to find key resources for their PhD journey.

the solution -

All in One Place: The PhD Hub Website


impact

And solving this mattered because, within the first 6 months:

  • Admins spent 40% less time answering questions.

  • Workshop participants increased by 2x.

  • Site traffic went up by 55% as students found information 50% faster.

  • Student satisfaction rate for collaborations and events - 40% higher.

action

What led to the solution?

  • User interviews

  • Student Focus Groups

  • "Lunch and Learn" workshops

  • Prototyping and usability testing - iterative

  • Web Development

👀 Peek Behind the Scenes

CONTEXT

Lost and looking! PhD students couldn’t find resources. Admins felt the strain.

  • It all started with a simple question -

Why aren’t PhD students signing up for events or workshops?

  • I began investigating this problem by interviewing PhD students, department heads and admins.

Below are some of the key findings:

Information was scattered everywhere!

PhD students struggle to find relevant academic resources, events, and support services in one location.

Students were unaware

A lot of times, students weren't even aware of events happening or services available to them.

Reaching out to admins for everything

Overwhelmed students sought admin help, but it wasn’t always feasible.

Frustration + disengagement

Finding information was frustrating which led to students wanting to disengage from available resources.

The Challenge

How might we help PhD students quickly find what they need in one centralized location?

RESEARCH

I led two student focus groups which helped me understand specific needs and possible actions.

Overview of student focus groups:

  • Duration: 1 hour each

  • Participants: 4 PhD students from different programs (anonymized)

Click to see focus group takeaways and possible action for each.

Lunch & Learn - Defining the website needs with admin depts over sandwiches

The Goal?

Gather insights on student needs, available resources, and department priorities.


The Result?

Feedback from students and administrators shaped the website’s requirements.


My team and I collaborated with Jamie Lloyd, Assistant Director at PhD Hub, to refine student resources on the website, holding meetings with her and the Director for feedback on our design throughout the process.

Now that I had all the information, it was time to map out the design.

INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

Making sense of the mess - how I structured the site map

Card sorting to the rescue!

For every iteration:


  • Participants: students, staff, admin, faculty, finance team.

  • Duration: 40 min

It took some refining (and a lot of coffee), but we finally designed the site map as seen below!

PROTOTYPING

I wireframed and prototyped the website using NYU's UI Kit and Figma

USABILITY TESING

Are the users finding what they need? - Let's test.

Three rounds of testing lasting 2 hours with:
- PhD Students
- PhD Staff
- PhD Administrators

Click to see user testing structure and some resulted design changes

FINAL DESIGN

After multiple tweaks and testing - ta-da! Here's the final website with most impactful features highlighted

REFLECTIONS

Turning feedback chaos into clarity

Integrating feedback was one of the biggest challenges - everything was constantly evolving, and it was easy to get lost in the chaos.


  • This experience taught me the importance of feature prioritization, ensuring that the most impactful changes were addressed first.


  • I also learned that aligning all stakeholders early through structured meetings helped streamline decisions and reduce unnecessary back-and-forth.


  • Most importantly, I realized the power of using data to support design choices turning subjective opinions into objective, actionable insights.

What would I do differently?

Knowing what I know now, I would do the following things differently:


  • Planning for future scalability.

  • Consistent process documentation.

  • Further accessibility considerations.